Wednesday, June 25, 2008

The Pigeons Come Home To Roost

Since 2004, we have warned Fiduciaries of ERISA Plans about the Plans’ Consultants wearing multiple hats and performing multiple responsibilities. We repeatedly said the way to avoid conflicts of interest is to only do one thing: actuaries be actuaries, investment advisors monitor investments, insurance agents sell insurance, etc.

On June 19, 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court sent out its own red flag in the monumental decision Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et. al. v. Glenn. This decision addressed the standards of conflict of interest for Plan advisors and the consequences to a Plan if it allows its consultants to engage in conflicts of interest. Although the decision is initially limited to insurance companies acting as disability plan administrators and providing benefits as well (which is huge by itself), the decision will have repercussions in the Pension and Health and Welfare industry for years and decades to come. How far down the totem pole the decision will go is not known, but as they say in the media, “here is what we do know:”

Any fiduciary or plan which doesn’t carry fiduciary insurance is at extreme risk.
Any fiduciary that allows its consultants to provide “other services” places the Plan and himself/herself at risk.
Any fiduciary who allows its consultants and insurance companies to combine in some sort of joint venture where denial of benefits accrue to the benefit of the consultants and insurance company puts the plan at risk.
Plan fiduciaries cannot waive conflicts of interest.

In other words the consultants and insurance companies must wear one hat and one hat only.

Here are a few words of wisdom from the “Supremes.”

· A benefit determination is a fiduciary act (i.e. an act which the … owes a special duty of loyalty to the beneficiaries.)
· Conflict of Interest is a “real or seeming incompatibility between one’s private interests and one’s public or fiduciary duties.”
· … the fact that a settler approves a … conflict does not change the need for a Judge to take account of that conflict in reviewing the Trustee’s decision making.”
· ERISA imposes higher-than-marketplace quality standards on insurers.

Next Time a Plan Consultant Offers to Place Your Plan’s Insurance – Just Call McLaughlin.

No comments: