U.S. Supreme Court opens Floodgates to Retirement Plan Participants Lawsuits

Participants in 401(k) and other retirement plans can file lawsuits claiming their individual accounts were mishandled, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a decision that bolsters the legal rights of 70 million people.

The justices today unanimously allowed a suit by a man who says he lost almost $100,000 because his employer didn't make investment changes he requested. The court rejected business contentions that participants can sue only to enforce the rights of the entire plan, not to recover losses incurred by a single account.

The ruling affects participants in so-called defined- contribution retirement programs -- a category that includes 401(k), employee stock ownership and profit-sharing plans. Those accounts hold $3.3 trillion in assets.

In the case before the justices, James LaRue says he tried to change the investments in his 401(k) plan in time to avoid the brunt of the 2001-02 stock market plunge. LaRue claims his employer, Dallas-based management-consulting firm DeWolff Boberg & Associates, didn't follow his instructions, costing him almost $100,000.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, barred the suit, saying it wasn't allowed under the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act, known as ERISA.
The Supreme Court today rejected that reasoning, saying Congress intended to provide broader protection to participants in retirement plans.

"Whether a fiduciary breach diminishes plan assets payable to all participants, or only to persons tied to particular individual accounts, it creates the kinds of harms that concerned the draftsmen'' of ERISA, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the court.

DeWolff Boberg argued that ERISA entitles LaRue to a court order directing the plan to change his investments but not to recoup the money he says he lost.

LaRue's legal team, backed by the Bush administration, said that approach would leave participants in defined-contribution plans with no recourse in the event their accounts are mishandled by the fiduciaries who administer the plan.

LaRue no longer works at DeWolff Boberg. In 2006, he closed his 401(k) account and withdrew the $119,000 balance.

Offered by employers, 401(k) plans let workers put a percentage of their paychecks into a tax-deferred investment account.

The case is LaRue v. DeWolff Boberg, 06-856.